HomeAbout UsOur ConsultantsOur ServicesClasses / EventsTestimonialsRefer a FriendFAQsBlogs & NewsContact Us
Archive Newer | Older

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Eating Out in NYC without Salt

New York City
has once again fired the first shot in yet another battle to provide dietary guidelines for their citizens.  In 2006, the NYC Department of Health banned trans-fats in food service establishments. This was followed up in 2008 by requiring that chains of 15 or more restaurants post calorie counts on their menu. Both these measures were met with stiff opposition from the restaurant industry, yet both passed the legislature and court challenges to become law.
 

Now the NYC health officials have set their sights on sodium chloride. Their newest initiative plans to reduce the average New Yorker’s daily salt intake by 25% over the next five years and by 50% in the next ten years.  Reasoning that people get the majority of their sodium from prepared meals, officials are again targeting the restaurants and commercial food processors to reduce the salt they put in their food. The underlying goal is to reduce health care costs associated with high blood pressure and heart disease. 
 

The NYC program is similar to one started in the United Kingdom in 2003.  A random sample of UK adults (19-64) taken in June 2008 indicate a 9% reduction in daily salt intake, from 9.5 g to 8.6 g since 2000. The FSA has targeted a further reduction to 6.0 g by 2010.
 

It is important to note that a high sodium diet is just one of the risk factors believed to contribute to heart disease or high blood pressure. Diets high in fat, obesity, smoking, lack of physical exercise, and heredity are also said to play a role in the development of coronary disease.
2:02 pm 

Thursday, April 16, 2009

FDA and Food Allergens

Should the FDA update their list of common food allergens?  The accepted allergen list for the United States contains the 8 most common allergy inducing foods; Milk, Eggs, Wheat, Fish, Shellfish, Peanuts, Tree nuts, and Soy. These are often referred to as the “Big 8” because it is believed they account for approximately 90% of food allergies in this country.  But there is ample evidence to suggest that adverse reactions to sesame / sesame seeds are on the rise. 

Ethnic foods are gaining popularity in the U.S., particularly snack foods marketed toward children. Many of these contain sesame or its byproducts. Some researchers believe it is simply a numbers game, the more people who eat a particular food, the greater probability of an allergic reaction.  This may account for localized allergen patterns in different countries.  Sesame is the 3rd leading cause of food allergies in the Middle East, after cow’s milk and eggs, whereas it is probably 9th among U.S. foods. The European Union adds sesame, celery, mustard, and sulfites, to the American list.

I personally don’t think the U.S. is ready to declare mustard and celery as major allergens, but the addition of sesame and sulfites to our accepted list may make sense at this time or in the near future. 
1:43 pm 

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

From Peanuts to Pistachios

First peanuts, now pistachios! Setton Pistachio of Terra Bella [California], Inc has issued a nationwide recall of up to 2 million pounds of pistachios due to possible contamination with Salmonella.  This appears to be just the first round of recalls because, like the earlier peanut crisis, the pistachios were used as ingredients in many other foods such as ice cream, cookies, and candy. The increased likelihood for additional product recalls caused Dr. David Acheson of the FDA to advise against eating pistachios of any kind until the source of contamination becomes better known. 
 

Salmonella has not historically been a problem with roasted nuts, since proper roasting would normally kill any bacteria that may be present.  These bacteria occur naturally in the intestinal tracts of animals and birds. So it is quite possible that the pistachios became contaminated through contact with birds or mice after the roasting occurred, either during processing or in storage.  
 

I wonder how the plant inspection reports from this California facility will measure up to the state and federal inspections of the Peanut Corporation of America (PCA) plants. If it comes out that rampant contamination issues existed but were not being reported properly, expect the outcries of food safety reform in the 111th Congress to intensify. With back-to-back outbreaks like this, I expect there will be some new regulations dictating probable contaminants in many foods that were previously deemed “safe”.
 
9:06 am 


Archive Newer | Older